11 November 2016
Supreme Court
Download

MANAGING DIRECTOR, U.P. RAJYA SAHAKARI KRISHI EVAM GRAMYA VIKAS BANK LTD Vs SUBHASH CHANDRA AWASTHI

Bench: ANIL R. DAVE,A.M. KHANWILKAR
Case number: C.A. No.-010868-010868 / 2016
Diary number: 34291 / 2016
Advocates: SUNIL KUMAR JAIN Vs


1

Page 1

NON­REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA                     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO.10868 OF 2016 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.33674/2016 @ CC 20729/2016)

                 MANAGING DIRECTOR, U.P. RAJYA SAHAKARI  

 KRISHI EVAM GRAMYA VIKAS BANK LTD &   ANR.                   ... APPELLANT(S)  

               VS.

      SUBHASH CHANDRA AWASTHI & ANR.       ... RESPONDENT(S)

       J U D G M E N T

ANIL R. DAVE, J.

Delay condoned.   Leave granted. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants.  He has  drawn  our  attention  to  a  judgment  of  this  Court delivered  on  31st January,  2013,  in  Civil  Appeal No.8415/2009 in the case of Assistant Engineer, Rajasthan Development Corporation & Anr. Vs. Gitam Singh, reported in (2013) 5 SCC 136.  2. Looking at the facts of the present case, in our opinion, Rs.75,000/- (Rupees Seventy Five Thousand only) would be the just compensation, which might be paid to Respondent No.1 by the appellants. 3. The appellants shall give an 'Account Payee Cheque' for Rs.75,000/- (Rupees Seventy Five Thousand only) to Respondent No.1 towards full and final payment for the amount, which might be payable to him.  The cheque will

1

2

Page 2

be sent to Respondent No.1 through speed post within two weeks from today along with a copy of this order. 4. If  Respondent  No.1  is  agreeable  to  receive  the amount in full settlement of all his claims against the appellants, he shall accept the cheque. 5. If Respondent No.1 is not prepared to accept the said amount, it would be open to him to approach this Court by way of an application, so that the matter can be reconsidered  and  in  that  event,  he  shall  return  the cheque to the appellants. 6. In view of the above order, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed.  No costs.   

       .............J. [ANIL R. DAVE]

................J. [A.M. KHANWILKAR]

New Delhi; 11th November, 2016.

2