M/S.ABHAYANANDA ASSOCIATES Vs THE AUTHORISED OFFICER
Bench: H.L. DATTU,JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR
Case number: C.A. No.-004119-004120 / 2013
Diary number: 36686 / 2012
Advocates: Vs
GAURAV KEJRIWAL
Page 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4119-4120 OF 2013 (SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(CIVIL)NOS.34282-34283 OF 2012)
M/S.ABHAYANANDA ASSOCIATES APPELLANT
VERSUS
THE AUTHORISED OFFICER & ANR. RESPONDENTS
O R D E R
1. Leave granted.
2. These appeals, by special leave, are directed against
the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Karnataka at
Bangalore in Writ Appeal No. 4856 of 2011 and Writ Appeal No.
5359 of 2012, dated 13.09.2012. By the impugned judgment and
order, the High Court had dismissed the appeals filed by the
auction purchaser questioning the demands raised by the
Corporation of City of Mangalore for payment of the property
tax.
3. Before this Court, the appellant-company has given
an undertaking that the company would deposit the property tax
of Rs.20 lacs as demanded by the Corporation. In view of that,
this Court had issued notice to the respondents. The
appellant-Company has now deposited a sum of Rs. 20 lacs in the
State Bank of Travancore.
4. When the matters were taken up for hearing, learned
counsel for the appellant-company had submitted that he is
ready and willing to deposit the entire auction amount to the
respondent-bank and would further undertake to pay any other
Page 2
: 2 :
liability such as property tax, etc. for the immovable property
in question. The appellant-company has now filed an affidavit
of undertaking before this Court categorically stating therein
that the company would undertake to pay the property tax, etc.
as and when it is due from the respondent-bank. The affidavit
of undertaking filed by the appellant-company dated,
14.03.2013, is taken on record and the same would be made the
part of the Decree.
5. In view of the affidavit of Undertaking given by the
appellant-company, we are of the view that the judgment and
order passed by the High Court requires to be modified.
Accordingly, while disposing of these appeals, we direct the
appellant-company to pay the amount(s) due to the respondent-
bank as on the date of the auction. On such payment, the bank
is directed to issue an appropriate sale certificate to the
appellant-company.
6. We further direct that the appellant-company is also
liable for all other payments towards the property in question
as and when the demands are raised by the Corporation of City
of Mangalore and/or any other authorities.
Ordered accordingly.
....................J. (H.L. DATTU)
....................J. (JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR)
NEW DELHI; APRIL 26, 2013