AMEER CHAND Vs NIRMAL CHAND
Bench: DALVEER BHANDARI,DEEPAK VERMA, , ,
Case number: Crl.A. No.-000916-000916 / 2011
Diary number: 4271 / 2008
Advocates: PARMANAND GAUR Vs
PRAGATI NEEKHRA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 916 OF 2011
(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.7094/2009)
AMEER CHAND Appellant(s)
:VERSUS:
NIRMAL CHAND Respondent(s)
(With CRL.M.P. No....../2011)
O R D E R
The order dated 30.11.2010 passed by this Court is
recalled.
Leave granted. This appeal emanates from the order dated
10.1.2008 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh,
Jabalpur Bench, in Criminal Revision No.1029 of 2005.
The appellant was convicted under Section 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and sentenced to one
year imprisonment by judgment and order dated 19th July,
2004 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class,
Rehli, in Criminal Case No.642/2003 which was affirmed by
the Additional Sessions Judge, Rehli and the High Court.
However, the sentence of the appellant was reduced by the
High Court to six months only.
-2-
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the
complainant-respondent that the entire amount due and
payable to the complainant has been deposited or paid to
him during the pendency of this matter and he does not
want to prosecute this case. An application has been
filed for compounding the offence of the appellant under
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
On consideration of the totality of the facts and
circumstances of this case, we are of the view that ends
of justice would meet if the impugned judgment is set
aside and the offence of the appellant is compounded. We
order accordingly.
The complainant-respondent is permitted to
withdraw the amount deposited by the appellant in the
Trial Court.
The appeal is disposed of with the aforementioned
observations and directions.
.....................J (DALVEER BHANDARI)
.....................J (DEEPAK VERMA)
New Delhi; April 8, 2011.