AMARCHAND TIWARI Vs STATE OF M.P.
Bench: HARJIT SINGH BEDI,CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, , ,
Case number: Crl.A. No.-001507-001507 / 2008
Diary number: 17920 / 2006
Crl.A. No. 1507 of 2008 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1507 of 2008
AMARCHAND TIWARI & ORS. ..... APPELLANTS
VERSUS
STATE OF M.P. ..... RESPONDENT
O R D E R
1. The appellants herein have been convicted under
Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and whereas
appellant No. 1, 2 and 3 had been sentenced to undergo
rigorous imprisonment for one year, appellant No. 4
Vishnu Prasad, the husband, has been sentenced to
undergo three years rigorous imprisonment. It is the
conceded position that Amarchand Tiwari and Gayatri
Devi, A1 and A3, have already undergone the one year's
sentence whereas A4 has undergone two years and eight
months of the sentence. We, accordingly, feel that the
ends of justice would be met if the sentence of Vishnu
Prasad is reduced to that already undergone by him.
Insofar as appellant No. 2 Navratri Tiwari is
concerned, we find that she was about 17 years of age
as on the date of the F.I.R. She was, accordingly, a
Crl.A. No. 1507 of 2008 2
juvenile on that date. Being a juvenile she could not
have been tried in a Criminal Court along with the
other accused. In normal circumstances, we would have
sent this matter back to the Juvenile Board insofar as
she was concerned but in the light of the fact that
many years have lapsed since the prosecution started,
we find that this procedure is not required to be
resorted to in the present case. In view of the above
facts the trial against Navaratri Devi appellant must
be held to be vitiated and her order of conviction is
accordingly, set aside. She is deemed to be acquitted.
2. No further orders are necessary.
3. The appeal stands disposed of accordingly.
.........................J [HARJIT SINGH BEDI]
........................J [CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD]
NEW DELHI APRIL 26, 2011.