SURESH MANI Vs THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
Judgment by: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
Case number: C.A. No.-011331-011331 / 2018
Diary number: 19688 / 2017
Advocates: R. D. UPADHYAY Vs
1
NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11331 OF 2018 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 5334 OF 2018]
SURESH MANI Appellant (s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s)
J U D G M E N T
KURIAN, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. This is a case where the appellant has been
struggling for approval as a Science Teacher ever
since 1986 under Respondent No. 5 – School. There is
no dispute that there was sanction for the subject of
Science. But, as rightly pointed out by the learned
Additional Advocate General appearing for the State,
there was no sanction for the post of Science
Teacher. We fail to understand that having
sanctioned the subject in a school, how can the
Department deny the sanction of a post of teacher.
The very purpose of sanctioning a subject is to have
said subject taught in the school, for which a
teacher is obviously required.
3. Be that as it may, the fact remains that the
appellant was considered for the selection grade in
2
the year 2003, as can be seen from the communication
dated 25.09.2003 of the District Inspector of School,
Deoria. Therefore, the technical objection regarding
sanction of post also fades into insignificance.
Though we agree with the learned Additional Advocate
General for the State that there was no sanction for
the post, which was a statutory requirement, having
regard to the peculiar facts of this case, we are of
the view that the appellant should be deemed to be
appointed as a regular Science Teacher, in view of
the proposal made in 2003 for selection in the grade.
Ordered accordingly. The appeal is, hence, allowed.
4. The appellant shall be deemed to be a duly
appointed teacher for all purposes. We make it clear
that this Judgment is passed in the peculiar facts of
this case and therefore, shall not be treated as a
precedent. All consequential benefits arising out of
the impugned Judgment shall be disbursed to the
appellant within a period of three months from today.
No costs.
.......................J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ]
.......................J. [ HEMANT GUPTA ]
New Delhi; November 26, 2018.