16 December 2013
Supreme Court
Download

RE:EXPLOI.OF CHILN.INJ ORPH.IN ST.OF T.N Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Bench: SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR,FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA
Case number: Writ Petition (crl.) 102 of 2007


1

Page 1

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA   CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

 WRIT PETITION (CRL.) No.102 of 2007

Re. Exploitation of Children in Orphanages in the State of Tamil Nadu   ...Petitioner(s)   

Versus

Union of India & Ors.                   … Respondent(s)

O R D E R

1. We have heard very lengthy submissions from the  

Amicus Curie Ms. Aparna Bhat, Ms. Indira Jaising, ASG,  

Mr. Paras Kuhad, ASG.

2. It has been brought to our notice that inspite of  

the emphatic directions that have been issued by this  

court on 3rd January, 2013 directing all the States and  

1

2

Page 2

the  Union  Territories  to  implement  the  protective  

provisions  contained  in  the  Protection  of  Rights  of  

Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, the Right of  

Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009  

and the Commission for Protection of Child Rights Act,  

2005,  many  States  and  Union  Territories  have  not  

complied  with  the same.  By order  dated 3rd January,  

2013, we had also directed the States to file an affidavit  

indicating  the  time  frame  within  which  the  State  

Commission  for  the  protection  of  children  would  be  

established. By a subsequent order dated 7th February,  

2013,  further directions were issued to all  the States  

and the Union Territories to comply with the obligations  

under  the  aforesaid  three  Acts,  with  regard  to  the  

establishment of protection institutions/implementation  

institutions,  together  with  necessary  Rules  and  

Regulations.  The aforesaid  order  was  to  be complied  

with within a period of three months from the date of  

receipt  of  the  certified  copy  of  the  order.  Sadly,  we  

have to notice that inspite of the concern shown not  

2

3

Page 3

only  by  this  Court  but  also  by  the  learned  counsel  

appearing for the parties, little or no progress has been  

made in this regard. Although the affidavits have been  

filed indicating that the State Commissions have been  

established yet we find that such establishment is only  

on paper. In many States, Chairman of the Commission  

has not been appointed and in some other States even  

Members  have  not  been  appointed.  This  apart,  

necessary  rules  and  regulations  have  also  not  been  

framed.  This,  in  our  opinion,  would  be  sufficient  

justification for  this Court to take a serious view and  

initiate appropriate proceedings for contempt of court  

against the defaulting States and the Union Territories.  

3. Given the lackadaisical manner in which the States  

and  the  Union  Territories  have  responded  to  the  

concern shown by this Court in relation to the wholly  

unacceptable situation prevailing and to stamp out any  

further  exploitation  of  children,  it  has  become  

necessary to re-emphasize that it is the bounden duty  

3

4

Page 4

of the States under Articles 21, 21A, 23, 24, 45 and 51A  

(k)  to  create  and  maintain  a  protective  and  healthy  

environment  in  which children who are  the  future  of  

this  country  can  bloom  and  subsequently  become  

mature and responsible citizen of this country. We have  

been  pained  to  notice  the  utterly  callous  attitude  

adopted by the States as well as the Union Territories.  

We, therefore, have no option at this stage but to issue  

some further mandatory directions to ensure that the  

exploitation  of  the  children  in  all  spheres  of  life  is  

brought to an end with utmost expedition.  

4. We may notice at this stage that pursuant to our  

earlier  directions  Tripura,  Dadar  and  Nagar  Haveli,  

Lakshwadeep,  Chandigarh,  Andaman  and  Nicobar,  

Pondicherry  and  Daman  and  Diu  have  still  not  

constituted State Commissions under Section 17 of the  

Commission  for  Protection  of  Child  Rights  Act,  2005.  

Some of the States which have established the State  

Commissions for the protection of children but have not  

4

5

Page 5

completely  constituted  the  same  by  either  not  

appointing a Chairperson or Members are as under:

Andhra Pradesh : The Commission exists only on  

paper as no Chairman/Member has been appointed.

Chattisgarh  is  partially  constituted  as  only  

Chairman has been appointed and the members have  

not been appointed.  

Gujarat : Although Chairman has been appointed  

yet  no  member  or  Secretary  of  the  Commission  has  

been appointed.  

Haryana  :  The  situation  is  exactly  the  same  as  

Gujarat,  i.e.  neither  any  Member  nor  Secretary  has  

been  appointed  although  the  Chairman  has  been  

selected and appointed.

Himachal Pradesh: Only a Member Secretary has  

been appointed. No Chairperson or Member has been  

appointed.  

Kerala  -  Again  only  a  Secretary  has  been  

appointed  but  there  is  no  Chairperson  or  Member  

appointed.

5

6

Page 6

Tamil  Nadu has appointed a Chairperson but no  

Member has been appointed.

Nagaland  –  Nothing  has  been  done,  i.e.  no  

Chairperson or Member has been appointed.

Similarly in U.P., nothing has been done as neither  

the Chairperson nor any Member has been appointed.

5. This inaction of the States is in the teeth of the  

directions issued by this Court on 3rd January, 2013 and  

7th February, 2013. We make it clear that this Court had  

taken  notice  of  the  exploitation  of  children  and  the  

deplorable conditions of children in various orphanages  

on the basis of the letter received, way back in the year  

2007. Surely, the States and the Union Territories must  

realize that they have to operate under the Constitution  

and have to be duty bound to act in accordance with  

the  provisions  of  the  Constitution.  Furthermore,  each  

and  every  field  which  concerns  the  welfare  and  the  

protection  of  the  children  is  covered  by  relevant  

6

7

Page 7

legislation. The three prominent Acts have already been  

listed hereinabove.

6. Keeping  in  view  the  aforesaid  attitude  of  the  

States  and  the  Union  Territories,  we  direct  that  the  

Chief Secretaries of all the States to which notices have  

been issued in this matter shall file an affidavit within a  

period  of  eight  weeks  from  the  date  of  this  order  

disclosing full details with regard to the implementation  

of the obligations specified under the three Acts. The  

affidavit shall contain all the relevant information with  

regard to the following :   

a. Whether the State Commissions have been  

set  up  under  Section  17  of  the  

Commissions for Protection of Child Rights  

Act, 2005?

b. Whether  the  appointment  of  the  

Chairperson  and  six  Members  has  been  

made  indicating  the  names  of  such  

Chairpersons and members?  

7

8

Page 8

c. Whether  Rules  have been framed by the  

State Governments under the said Act?

d. Whether  the  said  Commissions  are  

functional  and  if  not  what  are  the  

constraints.  The  appointment  and  the  

remuneration structure of the Chairperson,  

Members  and  supports  staff  including  

Member  Secretary  of  the  State  

Commissions?

e. The Chief Secretaries of the States in their  

affidavits to also indicate whether Special  

Courts  have  been  designated  under  

Section  28  of  the  Protection  of  Children  

from Sexual Offences Act, 2012?

f. Whether  Special  Public  Prosecutors  have  

been  appointed  under  Section  32  of  the  

said Act?

g. Whether  Rules  have  been  framed  under  

the Right to Education Act, 2009?

8

9

Page 9

h. Whether  all  Institutions  run  by  the  State  

Governments  or  by  Voluntary  

Organisations for Children in need care and  

protection have been registered under the  

provisions  of  Section  34  of  the  Juvenile  

Justice  (Care  and  Protection  of  Children)  

Act,  2000,  read with Rule  71 of  the said  

Act?

i. Whether  any  unregistered  institutions  for  

children in need of care and protection are  

being run and if  so have they been shut  

down  or  taken  over  by  the  State  

Governments?

7. It is further directed that in the unlikely event of  

there  being  a  non-compliance  of  any  part  of  the  

directions issued by this Court, an officer of the rank of  

Principal  Secretary  of  State Government  shall  remain  

present in person in the Court to clarify the issues with  

respect to the failure to implement the directions of the  

9

10

Page 10

Court. If for any reason, the affidavit, as directed for, is  

not filed by the Chief Secretary before the next date of  

hearing,  then  also,  the  officer  of  the  rank  referred  

above  shall  remain  present  in  person  to  explain  the  

reasons for the State’s failure to submit the affidavit.  

8. The  concerned  State  Governments  shall  also  

submit the required information in the format annexed  

hereto as part of the affidavit to be filed by them.  

………………………....J.         [Surinder Singh  

Nijjar]

……..……………………………J.       [Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim  

Kalifulla]

New Delhi; December 16, 2013.

10

11

Page 11

ANNEXURE

      THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012

S.N

o

Obligation of the States Current  Status  of  Implementa tion (Carried  out/not  carried  out)  with  details  as  to  the  date  of  order

             Detailed reasons for failure including Received  date  by  which  the  implementation would  stand carried out  

(a)                   (b)                (c)                  (d)

Steps taken     Circumstances   Person who   Dates on  which Towards          which rendered   was respon-  the matter  was Implementa-    implementation   sible for        monitored by tion                impossible            implemen-  Chief Secretary                                                    tation              towards                                                                         ensuring imple-                                                                          mentaton

 

1. Constitution  of  Special  Court (section 28)

2. Appointment of Special  Public  Prosecutor  (section 32)

3. Framing  of  Guidelines  

11

12

Page 12

for  use  of  NGOs,  experts  etc.  to  be  associated with the pre- trial  &  trial  stage  to  assist the child (section  39)

4. Public Awareness about  the Act  & any Periodic  Training  imparted  to  the officers of the Govt.  etc. (section 43)  

                   

12

13

Page 13

    THE RIGHT OF CHILDREN TO FREE & COMPULSORY EDUCATION ACT, 2009

S.N

o

Obligation  of  the  States

Current  Status  of  Implementa tion (Carried  out/not  carried  out)  with  details  as  to  the  date  of  order

             Detailed reasons for failure including Received  date  by  which  the  implementation  would  stand carried out  

(a)                   (b)                (c)                  (d)

Steps taken     Circumstances   Person who   Dates on  which Towards          which rendered   was respon-  the matter  was Implementa-    implementation   sible for        monitored by tion                impossible            implemen-  Chief Secretary                                                    tation              towards                                                                         ensuring imple-                                                                          mentaton

 

13

14

Page 14

1. Constitution  of  State Commissions  for  Protection  of  Child  Rights  (section  31  r/w  Rule 27)

2. Appointment  of  State  Advisory  Council   (section  34)

3. Rules  made  for  carrying  out  the  provisions  of  the  Act  (section 38)

14

15

Page 15

THE JUVENILE JUSTICE (CARE AND PROTECTION OF CHILDREN) ACT, 2000

S.N

o

Obligation  of  the States

Current  Status  of  Impleme ntation  (Carried  out/not  carried  out)  with  details  as to the  date  of  order

             Detailed reasons for failure including Received  date  by  which  the  implementation  would  stand  carried out  

(a)                   (b)                (c)                  (d)

Steps taken     Circumstances   Person who   Dates on  

 

15

16

Page 16

which Towards          which rendered   was respon-  the matter  was Implementa-    implementation   sible for        monitored by tion                impossible            implemen-  Chief Secretary                                                    tation              towards                                                                         ensuring imple-                                                                          mentaton  

1. Constitution  of  Juvenile  Justice  Board  (section 4)

2. Establishment  of  Observation  Homes  (section 8)

3. Establishment  of  Special  Homes  –  If  any,  details.  (section 9)

4. Constitution  of  child  Welfare  Committee  (section 29)  

5. Establishment  of  Children’s  Homes  (section 34)

6. Appiontment  of  Inspection  

16

17

Page 17

Committee  –  If  any, details  (section 35)

7. Recognition  of  Shelter  Homes  –  If  any,  details  (section 37)  

8. Creation  of  Fund  for  the  welfare  of  juveniles  (section 61)

THE COMMISSION FOR PROTECTION OF CHILD RIGHTS ACT, 2005

S.N

o

Obligation  of  the States

Current  Status  of  Implementati on  (Carried  out/not  carried  out)  with  details  as to the date  of order

             Detailed reasons for failure including Received  date  by  which  the  implementation  would  stand carried out  

(a)                   (b)                (c)                  (d)   

17

18

Page 18

Steps taken     Circumstances   Person who   Dates on  which Towards          which rendered   was respon-  the matter  was Implementa-    implementation   sible for        monitored by tion                impossible            implemen-  Chief Secretary                                                    tation              towards                                                                         ensuring imple-                                                                          mentaton   

1. Constitution  of  State  Commission  for  Protection  of  Child  Rights  (section 17)

2. Appointment  of  Chairperson  and  other  members  (section 18)

3. Appointment  of  Secretary  &  other  officers  for  carrying  out  the  functions  of  the  State  Commission  (section 21(1)

4. Annual  &  

18

19

Page 19

Special  Reports  submitted  by  State  Commission  to  the  State.  If  any, details  (section  23(1))  

5. Constitution  of  Children’s  Court (section  25)  

6. Appointment  of  Special  Public  Prosecutor  (section 26)  

7. Grants by the  State  Government  to  the  State  Commission.  If  any, details  (section 28(1)

8. Rules  made  to  carry  out  the provisions  of  the  Act  (Section  36(1).

19