PREM CHAND Vs STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
Bench: H.L. GOKHALE,J. CHELAMESWAR
Case number: Crl.A. No.-001274-001274 / 2013
Diary number: 17696 / 2012
Advocates: E. C. AGRAWALA Vs
SYED MEHDI IMAM
Page 1
1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1274 OF 2013
(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.5972/2012)
PREM CHAND Appellant(s)
:VERSUS:
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Respondent(s)
O R D E R
Leave granted.
2. Heard Ms. Radhika Gautam, learned counsel
appearing for the appellant and Mr. Ajay Marwah,
learned counsel appearing for the State of Himachal
Pradesh.
3. The only question which arises in this
appeal is as to whether the fine to the tune of
Rs.60,000/- imposed on the appellant is steep. The
appellant was charged under Section 324 & 326 of
the Indian Penal Code. The Trial Court acquitted
the appellant for the offences as charged. The
High Court though allowed the appeal of the State,
has taken a considerate view considering that
nearly 12-13 years have gone by from the date of
the incident till the matter was heard by it. The
Page 2
2
High Court retained the conviction under Section
324 of the IPC but imposed a fine of Rs.60,000/-.
4. Counsel for the appellant has brought to
our notice that the appellant is a poor labourer
and a certificate to that effect rendered by the
Gram Panchayat of the concerned village dated
30.3.2012 has been annexed to this petition. She
submits that in view thereof, the fine may be
reduced to the minimum. Counsel for the State
leaves it to the Court to pass appropriate order
in this behalf. In the circumstances, we reduce
the amount of fine to Rs.10,000/- only.
5. Counsel for the appellant states that the
Gram Panchayat has already made the payment of
steep fine on behalf of the appellant. That being
so, the amount over and above Rs.10,000/- will be
refunded to the Appellant/Gram Panchayat. The
appeal is allowed to this extent.
.........................J (H.L. GOKHALE)
.........................J (J. CHELAMESWAR)
New Delhi; August 26, 2013.