DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs MANISH
Bench: KURIAN JOSEPH,R. BANUMATHI
Case number: C.A. No.-004280-004280 / 2017
Diary number: 5933 / 2017
Advocates: SAHARYA & CO. Vs
Page 1
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.4280 OF 2017
[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 8632 OF 2017] [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C).....CC. NO. 5039/2017]
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPELLANT(S) VERSUS
MANISH AND ORS RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T
KURIAN, J. 1. Delay condoned. 2. Leave granted. 3. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgments in Civil Appeal No. 8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 8467 of 2015 and Civil Appeal No. 5811 of 2015 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 21545 of 2015. 4. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. 5. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh. 6. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if in possession, shall return the physical possession of the land to the owner.
1
Page 2
7. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. 8. There shall be no orders as to costs.
.......................J. [KURIAN JOSEPH]
.......................J. [R. BANUMATHI]
NEW DELHI; MARCH 20, 2017.
2