AJMER ZILLA DUGDH UTPADAK SAHAKARI&ANR. Vs AJMER ZILLA DAIRY EMPLOYEES UNION &ORS.
Bench: H.L. DATTU,CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD
Case number: C.A. No.-007946-007946 / 2012
Diary number: 6503 / 2012
Advocates: PURUSHOTTAM SHARMA TRIPATHI Vs
PRATIBHA JAIN
Page 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7946 OF 2012 (SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(CIVIL)NO.8440 OF 2012)
AJMER ZILLA DUGDH UTPADAK SAHAKARI APPELLANTS SANGH & ANR. VERSUS
AJMER ZILLA DAIRY EMPLOYEES UNION &ORS. RESPONDENTS
WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7947 OF 2012 @ S.L.P.(C)NO. 9457/2012
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7948-7950 OF 2012 @ S.L.P.(C)NOS. 10407-10409/2012
O R D E R
1. No orders on application for impleadment in
C.A.@S.L.P.(C)No.9457/2012.
2. Leave granted in all the Special Leave Petitions.
3. These appeals are directed against the common
judgment and dated order dated 23.12.2011 passed
by the High Court of Judicature of Rajasthan at
1
Page 2
Jodhpur in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.9818, 9822, 3658, 3940
and 11864/2011.
4. We have heard Mr.P.P.Rao and Mr.Dushyant Dave,
learned senior counsel for the appellants in Civil Appeals @
S.L.P.(C)Nos.8440 and 9457 of 2012 and Ms.Madhurima Tatia,
learned counsel for the appellant in Civil Appeal @S.L.P.
(C)Nos.10407-10409/2012 and Mr.Sushil Kumar Jain, learned
counsel for the respondents in Civil Appeals @ S.L.P.
(C)Nos.8440 and 9457 of 2012 and Mr.M.R.Calla, learned senior
counsel for the respondents in Civil Appeals @ S.L.P.
(C)Nos.10407-10409/2012.
5. Taking into consideration the peculiar facts
and circumstances of these cases, we modify the order of the
High Court and direct the Ajmer Zilla Dughdh Utpadak Sahakari
Sangh, Rajasthan Co-operative Dairy Federation Ltd. and
Paschimi Rajasthan Dugadh Utpadak Sahakari Sangh
Ltd. to re-consider the issue of enhancement of
age from 58 years to 60 years bearing in mind the
2
Page 3
communication of the Registrar, Co-operative Societies, dated
17.09.2008 and the clarification made thereof.
6. It is made clear that we have not expressed
any opinion in regard to the merit of the claim and it shall be
open for the Federation and the Societies aforesaid to take a
final decision without being influenced by the earlier decision
of the High Court. The question of maintainability and other
issues is also left open to be decided in an appropriate case.
7. With these observations, the appeals are
disposed of. No costs.
.......................J. (H.L. DATTU)
.......................J. (CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD)
NEW DELHI; NOVEMBER 08, 2012